The Department of Health and Human Services announced on April 9, 2012, a proposed rule that would delay the compliance date for ICD-10 one year to October 1, 2014. Read the entire CMS release below.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
April 9, 2012
Contact: CMS Media Relations Group
(202) 690-6145

FACT SHEET
HHS proposes one-year delay of ICD-10 compliance date
(CMS-0040-P)

Action
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) today announced a proposed rule that would delay, from October 1, 2013 to October 1, 2014, the compliance date for the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition diagnosis and procedure codes (ICD-10).

The ICD-10 compliance date change is part of a proposed rule that would adopt a standard for a unique health plan identifier (HPID), adopt a data element that would serve as an “other entity” identifier (OEID), and add a National Provider Identifier (NPI) requirement. The proposed rule was developed by the Office of E-Health Standards and Services (OESS) as part of its ongoing role, delegated by HHS, to establish adopt standards for electronic health care transactions under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). OESS is part of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Background
On January 16, 2009, HHS published a final rule to adopt ICD-10 as the HIPAA standard code sets to replace the previously adopted ICD–9–codes for diagnosis and procedure codes (see HIPAA Administrative Simplification; Modifications to Medical Data Code Set Standards to Adopt ICD-10-CM and ICD-10-PCS, 74 FR 3328). The compliance date set by the final rule was October 1, 2013.

Implementation of ICD-10 will accommodate new procedures and diagnoses unaccounted for in the ICD-9 code set and allow for greater specificity of diagnosis-related groups and preventive services. This transition will lead to improved accuracy in reimbursement for medical services, fraud detection, and historical claims and diagnoses analysis for the health care system. Many researchers have published articles on the far-reaching positive effects of ICD-10 on quality issues, including use of specific reasons for patient non-compliance and detailed procedure information by degree of difficulty, among other benefits.

Some provider groups have expressed serious concerns about their ability to meet the October 1, 2013 compliance date. Their concerns about the ICD-10 compliance date are based, in part, on implementation issues they have experienced meeting HHS’ compliance deadline for the Associated Standard Committee's (ASC) X12 Version 5010 standards (Version 5010) for electronic health care transactions. Compliance with Version 5010 is necessary prior to implementation of ICD-10.

All covered entities must transition to ICD-10 at the same time to ensure a smooth transition to the updated medical data code sets. Failure of any one industry segment to achieve compliance with ICD-10 would negatively impact all other industry segments and result in rejected claims and provider payment delays. HHS believes the change in the compliance date for ICD-10, as proposed in this rule, would give providers and other covered entities more time to prepare and fully test their systems to ensure a smooth and coordinated transition among all industry segments.

Provisions of the proposed rule announced today
HHS is proposing to change the ICD-10 compliance date to October 1, 2014.

As stated, the ICD-10 compliance date change is part of a proposed rule that would adopt a standard for a unique health plan identifier (HPID), adopt a data element that would serve as an “other entity” identifier (OEID), and add a National Provider Identifier (NPI) requirement.

Standards compliance date
HHS proposes that covered entities must be in compliance with ICD-10 on October 1, 2014.

The proposed rule, CMS-0040-P, may be viewed at www.ofr.gov/inspection.aspx

A news release on the proposed rule may be viewed at http://www.hhs.gov/news

# # # # #

Today’s Justice and Public Safety agencies face many challenges, which call for thoughtful strategies and collaboration between agencies and systems. BerryDunn’s Government Consulting Group offers perspective for the strategic operation of these agencies.

BerryDunn delivers sound, objective advice, backed by broad experience and proven methodologies. With our understanding and insight of processes and systems, used to support the delivery of justice and public safety services, our consultants work collaboratively to provide better results.

For over 25 years, our experts have been helping government clients solve problems and leverage strengths. BerryDunn is an independent and objective consulting firm. We do not sell hardware or software, nor do we have an interest in implementing particular solutions. This allows us to provide objective recommendations that are only in our client’s best interests.

In January 2012, Doug Rowe, a Senior Consultant at BerryDunn, became a certified Project Management Professional (PMP). The PMP certification is one of the most widely-recognized professional certification for project management and is a designation of the Project Management Institute (PMI). The PMP designation indicates that the holder has mastered the project management body of knowledge and as demonstrated experience leading and directing project teams.

Doug brings 30 years of IT industry experience to our team, including project management, enterprise system deployment, quality assurance, curriculum development and training, and technology support.

Congratulations Doug!

BerryDunn is pleased to announce several promotions in the firm’s Government Consulting Group, including Charlie Leadbetter to Principal, Nicole Carrier to Senior Consultant, and Seth Hedstrom to Senior Consultant.

Charlie specializes in working with clients in state and local government and is knowledgeable of business processes and systems, large-scale implementation best practices, and project management best practices. Charlie joined the firm in 1993 and is a certified Project Management Professional (PMP), a designation of the Project Management Institute (PMI). He is a graduate of the University of Maine and is a member of the National Association of State Chief Information Officers (NASCIO).

Nicole specializes in working with state Medicaid agencies in meeting their goals using professional project management best practices and objective quality assurance monitoring. Nicole joined the firm in 2002 and is a graduate of the University of Southern Maine.

Seth specializes in working with local government clients on a variety of projects including technology planning, organizational needs assessments, systems planning and procurement, and the implementation of information systems. Seth joined the firm in 2009 and is a graduate of Babson College. He is also a Certified Associate of Project Management (CAPM), a designation of PMI.